Comparing investment performance

Hi all

At the moment, when analysing existing plans we use FE Analytics to build a graph of performance since inception (or earliest data) based on the current portfolio and discrete calendar performance and we do the same against the recommended portfolio.

Recently, a technical specialist from a provider told me that the FCA wants a comparison of 1,3,5 and 10 years performance rather than calendar discrete - but I cannot find anywhere that backs this up. They suggested we show both - what we are doing plus the 1,3,5 and 10 year comparison but I think that's too much!

What does everyone else do?

Comments

  • We tend to use scatter plots which assess volatility against performance rather than performance in isolation, as this gives a more rounded picture of whether the fund offers value for money, or whether too much (or too little) risk is being taken

    That said, it is fairly easy to knock out a chart with these time periods - I think you can get four periods on one page iirc

  • benjaminfabibenjaminfabi Moderator
    Unless you have the complete history of all trades on both sides for the whole period then it's meaningless.

    I focus my analysis on asset allocation and risk management. I have a custom table and a spreadsheet that builds an asset allocation chart and I'll do a 1 and 3 year scatter as an indicator of what this means in practice. Caveat being that its based on that portfolio backtested over three years without any management
    Benjamin Fabi FPFS
    Chartered Financial Planner
Sign In or Register to comment.